The mainstream media has been successful in hiding who she is. Let us all make sure on November 5 that America never finds out.
British philosopher Anthony Flew coined the phrase “No True Scotsman” fallacy, which he wrote about in his 1975 book Thinking About Social Thinking. He illustrated it with a hypothetical conversation in which someone claims, “No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.” When presented with a counterexample of a Scotsman who does, the person retorts, “Well, no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.”
In the realm of religion and politics, variations of this phrase are employed to ward off debate over whether one is a “true” (fill-in-the-blank). It is a trick used to eliminate anyone who does not conform 100% to the beliefs of a group or sect. The individual you are discussing something with claims that person is not part of that group or sect because they are not pure.
There are scores of Christian denominations, from Catholic to Jehovah’s Witnesses and everything in between. If you ask anyone in any denomination if their beliefs are the true ones, they will assert they are and that someone in a different denomination is not a true Christian because they don’t believe (fill in the blank). This same curiosity also applies to politics, where people often say, “He is no true Democrat/Republican because he doesn’t believe X, Y, and Z.” That statement implies that you have to believe everything that the “true” and correct believers think, or you are not in their exclusive club. When someone doesn’t want another person to be thought of as one of them, they will find a way to use the “No True Scotsman” fallacy.
This sort of sleight of hand is used in reverse when it comes to the lady who would destroy America if she were elected president. She would make the plot of Obama, who vowed to fundamentally change America, and Biden, who continued his promise with the importation of illegal aliens and hiring people solely based on their skin color or sexual proclivities look like child’s play. Those changes amounted to inflation, two wars, malaise, division, and anger by pitting one side against the other using fear, guilt, and shame, which are tactics used by various cults. Kamala’s policies will result in a depression the likes of which we have never seen.
Kamala Harris refuses to admit and delineate what she wants for America, except for taxing billionaires more, giving minorities a down payment for a house and a business, unfettered immigration, doing away with police and ICE, and “having a conversation” about reparations, as if all of the above isn’t enough. One has to look at the code words of equity, community, and holistic she uses when asked to be specific about her ideas. Those words and phrases are all staples of Marxism.
This brings us to the premise of this article, which is the “No True Scotsman” fallacy. In keeping with the current wokism sickness infecting the world, I guess it should be changed to “No True Scotsher” because Kamala insisted at a meeting, “I am Kamala Harris. My pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit.” Among many other things, this was her salvo that warned any male that she was superior to them by virtue of her title, as well as that she was all about identity politics. She looks at everyone by race and color and not by the content of their character.
Her supporters don’t want her referred to as a Marxist because she hasn’t come out and said that she wants to do away with private property. To those who know that Marxism is a bad word in the United States, they will say that unless she comes out and specifically says that she wants to eliminate private property, she cannot be a “true Marxist.” Kamala Harris’s father, Donald Harris, is a retired economics professor from Stanford University and has been described as a Marxist economist. He co-authored a treatise in 1988 titled “Black Economic Progress: An Agenda for the 1990s,” which discussed the impact of mass immigration on black Americans and critiqued U.S. immigration laws.
This is a rather fact-filled but lengthy article that shows the heavy influence that her radical parents had on her, but this snippet shows a glimpse of what she thinks America is and should be:
Her Father’s Daughter: Donald Harris’ Hidden Influence on Kamala
“Following in her father’s footsteps, Kamala studied economics at Howard University in a program founded by black Marxist scholar Abram Lincoln Harris Jr., who argued that capitalism was morally bankrupt.
Kamala, who served as president of the Abram Harris Economics Society, describes herself as a capitalist. But, like her father, she appears to reject free markets in favor of “equity,” which seeks to engineer economic outcomes for blacks. “Everybody should end up in the same place,” she has argued, with the same income, property, and assets. Because blacks didn’t start in the same place, she explains, they “need more equitable distribution.”
Her long career shows unwavering support for government welfare programs and race-based preferences and the redistribution of income to pay for them. “[We must be] giving resources based on equity,” she’s said. “If you look at the reality of who will benefit from certain policies, when you take into account that they’re not starting at the same place, and they’re not starting on equal footing,” she added, “it will directly benefit black children, black families, black homeowners.”
These ideas are influencing her campaign promises, which include “fully forgivable” loans up to $20,000 for black entrepreneurs and unspecified “others” and $25,000 for down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers. Harris is also offering $6,000 a year in tax credit payments for low-income families with children to help “close the wealth gap.” To help pay for these initiatives, she has pledged to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 35%, which is higher than the 28% that President Biden had proposed, and to hike taxes on those earning more than $400,000. She also proposes increasing estate taxes, taxing capital gains on stocks and home sales at regular income rates, and, for the first time in history, taxing the unrealized gains of the wealthy.
In a 2019 interview on ABC’s “The View,” Kamala was even open to the idea of raising the top individual tax rate to as high as 80%. “That should be discussed,” she intoned.”
Has Mainstream Media bothered to uncover any of this? You know the answer to that is no, because they don’t want you to know, and they agree with these positions. Throughout the ages, humans have been brainwashed or indoctrinated by what they are not told more so than what they are told. With the advent of DEI hiring and radical leftists being hired by the major news networks, we now have a radical press corps to match a radical presidential candidate. They need her to win so they can keep their jobs because, as it is, they have a direct pipeline to the White House and are first in line for tips on news and stocks to buy. Their jobs will be in jeopardy when they are cut off from that very important pipeline. Combine that with alternate media such as this site, YouTube channels that draw more viewers than CNN and MSNBC, and you know why they intentionally hide these stories from their viewers and gave Kamala Harris a makeover far more impressive than Max Factor or any movie could ever dream of having done.
Her parents grew up in a day and age that has long since passed and a belief system that those on the bottom need the elitists to elevate them up not by teaching them how to fish but by giving them a never-ending supply of fish caught by others. This is not to say that the truly poor can’t use some help in the way of temporary assistance, but to give them free things without any strings attached keeps them dependent on their benefactors. That may make their government helpers rich and happy, as it always does with that system of government, but it does nothing to elevate people and everything to keep them where they are.
Just as a Catholic, a Baptist, a Mormon, a Seventh-Day Adventist, and a hundred other denominations are not true Christians, Kamala Harris is not a true Marxist. After all, she hasn’t come out and said she wants to do away with private property. She only wants to do away with people having MORE private property than those who don’t work for it. It’s called equity, community, and the holistic approach. Certainly not Marxism. How can anyone be so ridiculous as to assert she is a “true” Marxist? Why, that’s like saying a Catholic is a “true” Christian! The nerve!
